View by opposition team [change view]
Opposition team Pakistan remove Pakistan from query
Start of match date less than or equal to 8 Mar 1992 remove less than or equal to 8 Mar 1992 from query
Totals in terms of batting team switch totals
Ordered by average runs per six balls (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 10 of 10 First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page Return to query menu
Cleared query menu
By opposition team
South Africa 1992-1992 1 1 0 0 0 0 - 30.14 4.22 1 211 - investigate this query
v Pakistan
Zimbabwe 1992-1992 1 0 1 0 0 0 0.000 28.71 4.02 1 201 - investigate this query
v Pakistan
Sri Lanka 1975-1992 47 8 33 0 5 1 0.242 24.86 3.56 55 479 101 investigate this query
v Pakistan
West Indies 1958-1992 85 49 24 1 11 0 2.041 31.35 3.56 108 790 53 investigate this query
v Pakistan
Australia 1956-1990 67 27 25 0 13 2 1.080 33.79 3.14 94 617 80 investigate this query
v Pakistan
India 1952-1992 82 16 31 0 33 2 0.516 32.53 3.04 112 539 79 investigate this query
v Pakistan
England 1954-1992 77 32 15 0 29 1 2.133 33.92 2.84 108 558 122 investigate this query
v Pakistan
New Zealand 1955-1990 55 14 24 0 16 1 0.583 26.17 2.71 82 492 64 investigate this query
v Pakistan
Bangladesh 1986-1988 2 0 2 0 0 0 0.000 12.81 2.54 2 111 94 investigate this query
v Pakistan
Canada 1979-1979 1 0 1 0 0 0 0.000 15.44 2.31 1 139 - investigate this query
v Pakistan
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 10 of 10 First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page
Go to page
Statsguru includes the following current or recent relevant matches:
Namibia v Oman at Bridgetown, ICC Men's T20 World Cup 3rd Match, Jun 2, 2024 [T20I # 2634 - Live]
    » Namibia 42/2 (8.3 ov, JN Frylinck 17*, Aqib Ilyas 1/6)
West Indies v Papua New Guinea at Providence, ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2nd match, Jun 2, 2024 [T20I # 2633 - Live]
    » West Indies 137/5 (19.0 ov, AD Russell 15*, RL Chase 42*, KV Morea 0/30) - Match over
United States of America v Canada at Dallas, ICC Men's T20 World Cup 1st match, Jun 1, 2024 [T20I # 2632]
 
Feedback Print this page